Dietary Guidelines Do-Over
Following widespread criticism, experts offer tweaks to the latest
Dietary Guidelines for Americans.
Critics offer amendments to the government’s newly-minted nutrition advice.
When
the 2015-2020 Dietary Guidelines for Americans were finally released
last month, government officials said the recommendations reflected the
latest and best science on food and nutrition. The guidelines – which aim to
help Americans eat better and support public health efforts, such as reducing chronic disease – urge people to significantly cut back on sugar and note, for the first time, that teen boys and men should reduce their intake
of “protein foods” by consuming less meat, poultry and eggs. Such advice drew
praise. Still, many experts criticized the guidelines as being watered
down by food-industry influence, saying they didn’t go far enough to mirror
evidence-based recommendations. Here's a sampling of the advice some wish had been included:
Cut red meat consumption.
In place of
general advice on protein consumption, many argued the new guidelines should have explicitly stated that Americans need to consume less red and processed meat, as laid out in
the proposed
recommendations
by the Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee. That would mean eating more plant-based protein such as nuts and beans. "Limiting intake [of red meat] to once or twice a week will avoid the large
majority of the adverse health effects," says Walter Willett, chair of the
department of nutrition at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health in
Boston, in an email. Those range from a higher incidence of heart disease and diabetes to
cancer. “Processed red meat should be largely eliminated for optimal
health.”
Name the bad apples in your diet (which, of course, aren’t apples).
Though praised for highlighting healthy eating patterns, like a Mediterranean-style diet, the dietary guidelines could have gone further to name actual foods and drinks that Americans should probably consume less of, in addition to singling out “nutrients of concern” like salt, according to critics. “The guidelines, for example, say get less than 10 percent of your calories from saturated fat,” says Bonnie Liebman, director of nutrition at the Center for Science in the Public Interest in the District of Columbia. “Well, for many people, that’s going to go in one ear and out the other.” She says more needs to be done to translate that and other blanket advice into practical steps to achieve goals, such as replacing butter with olive oil and other healthy oils when cooking and switching to low-fat milk.
Eat even less sugar.
The latest guidelines recommend reducing sugar consumption to no more than 10 percent of a person’s daily calories. But as the science increasingly reveals sugar’s myriad ill effects on health, Barry Popkin, a professor of nutrition at the University of North Carolina–Chapel Hill, says we should cut that amount in half. “The United Kingdom and many other countries have adopted only having 5 percent of your calories from added sugar,” he says, which approximates to 15 teaspoons of sugar daily, on average, for an adult. That’s around the amount found in a single, full-size can of regular soda.
Snack smart.
The guidelines talk about meals,
but Sally Findley, a professor of
population and family health at Columbia University’s Mailman
School of Public Health in New York City, says she’d
wished healthy
snacks would have been covered in the latest recommendations. “I
think that the guidelines should have been clearer that snacks should be
nuts or fresh fruits or carrots ... and that you should stay away from
the empty calorie ones," she says, from that bag of chips to french fries. For kids
and adults, she notes, it's important to plan ahead. That will help prevent vending-machine-enabled dietary mishaps.
Eat more pulses.
Yes, pulses, those unassuming pod-plant powerhouses (think lentils). While a vegetarian diet was not recommended in the final guidelines, the Dietary
Guidelines Advisory Committee advocated for a more plant-based diet because of the health and environmental benefits. In an email, Kelly Toups, a registered
dietitian at Oldways, a Boston-based nonprofit that promotes healthy eating,
says you should aim to do just that, in part, by eating more pulses – just in time to partake in the 2016
United Nations-declared International Year of Pulses. Incorporating the leguminous crops into your diet will help you beef up on plant-based
protein and up
your intake of essential nutrients, such as fiber, potassium and folate, Toups says.
Consider the planet’s health, too.
Though it might seem at first blush a purely altruistic exercise, making environmentally-friendly, sustainable food choices – suggested by the guidelines advisory committee but not highlighted in the final dietary recommendations – can ultimately prove healthier as well. “For example, vegetables that aren’t picked too early [and that don’t] have to be shipped across the country – they’re more nutrient-dense,” says Bob Martin, director of the Food System Policy Program at the Johns Hopkins Center for a Livable Future in Baltimore. Eating more heart-healthy, plant-based protein in place of meat is also more energy efficient, he notes, since it means fewer crops are needed to make animal feed.
Michael O. Schroeder, Staff Writer
Michael O. Schroeder has been a health editor at U.S. News since 2015. He writes health ... Read more
health disclaimer »
Disclaimer and a note about your health »


