This is a dangerous statement to make with little information that actually explains why formula use increased. Why were breastfed babies offered formula in the first place?! Who made the decision that formula was needed? A small study does not warrant changing what the lactation consultants, WHO, and Baby Friendly have recommended, which is also research based.
This sort of statement sends a dangerous message the the uninformed public.
Please, do not purpetuate this belief.
Paula D Quick, CNmof TX5:08AM May 03, 2012
More mothers should be educated about breastfeeding. They need to be taught the breastfeeding process and the benefits of breast milk such as its ability to improve immune system and fight infections (source: http://www.breastpumpsforsale.com/breast-feeding/). These steps are more likely to increase the uptake of breastfeeding.
Darrenof AL9:07AM May 02, 2012
I agree with Dr. Schanler's view that this study does not provide the kind of evidence that supports changing health care practices. If Dr. Phillipi wants to do what's best for babies and give parents the best evidence possible, she needs to avoid using the data from this limited and flawed study as the source of recommendations to parents. It would be a huge leap to start recommending pacifier use based on this, especially in view of prior studies which have shown associations between pacifier use and shorter breastfeeding duration. Even though at least one prospective study has not shown that the association is causative, the current study is far from proving the opposite.
Reader Comments
Back to article
Paula D Quick, CNm of TX 5:08AM May 03, 2012
Darren of AL 9:07AM May 02, 2012
Alicia Dermer, MD of NJ 11:39PM May 01, 2012