By Jenifer Goodwin
FRIDAY, March 23 (HealthDay News) -- Researchers report that they have identified abnormalities in the DNA and RNA of cells in the prefrontal cortex of the brains of autistic children.
The findings may help to explain the underlying mechanism for the brain "overgrowth" that prior reports have documented in autistic children. Those studies have found that the brains of young children with autism are larger than the brains of non-autistic children, particularly in the prefrontal cortex. The prefrontal cortex is key to complex thoughts and behaviors, including language, social behavior and decision-making.
This growth abnormality likely contributes significantly to the social,communication, and emotional deficits common among people with autism, the researchers said.
In the new study, researchers analyzed tissue from the prefrontal cortexes of 33 postmortem brain samples from autistic and non-autistic people aged 2 to 56.
In addition to DNA differences known as copy number variations, researchers also did genome-wide RNA profiling and found differences in RNA between the autistic and non-autistic brains. RNA (ribonucleic acid) plays crucial roles within cells, serving as an intermediary between DNA, the blueprints for genetic information, and the production of proteins that carry out a vast array of vital activities in cells.
The RNA abnormalities appear to be involved with genes that code for proteins regulating cellular growth, the researchers said.
"What we found was the networks that are supposed to regulate the genesis of brain cells and develop them were abnormal. The networks that were supposed to regulate DNA repair were turned down. And the networks supposed to regulate neuron removal and survival were abnormal," said study author Eric Courchesne, director of the Autism Center of Excellence at the University of California, San Diego (UCSD) School of Medicine.
The study is published in the March 22 issue of PLoS Genetics.
How might these differences fit into the autistic picture?
Preliminary research by the UCSD team found that an excessive amount of neurons, or brain cells, might account for the overgrowth. While typically developing kids had about 0.88 billion neurons in the prefrontal cortex, autistic children had about 1.57 billion.
According to the researchers, the copy number variations along with the RNA abnormalities may disrupt the cell cycle and may explain the underlying mechanism driving the overgrowth.
"We found DNA defects, or copy number variations, in a variety of genes that regulate cell production and cell survival," Courchesne said. "To us, that suggests the explanation for why there are an abnormal number of neurons in the prefrontal cortex. Those genes fall into networks that control the number of neurons generated and the number that survive in prenatal life."
Researchers also noted that the RNA differences vary, depending on the age of the brain, with children and adults having different RNA profiles.
Courchesne said that the way the brain responds to that overgrowth of neurons -- in other words, what's happening in those repair pathways -- may help to explain why people with autism may have different trajectories, with some seeming to regress and others continuing to learn new skills throughout their lifetime.
"In adulthood, we see individuals that continue to improve, and continue to gain more and more skills and abilities," Courchesne said. "Then there are others that don't show that continued, ongoing improvement or show the opposite. My best guess is the trajectory has less to do with the original cause of the autism, than with an individual's specific composition of genes, or the available genes to remodel the brain."
Robert Ring, vice president for translational research at Autism Speaks, said researchers offer up a provocative and plausible theory. However, he noted that while brain overgrowth is well-established, only one, small study has shown that the explanation for it is too many neurons.
"What's valuable about the approach this group has taken is that they've gone directly to the tissue of interest, and have asked, 'Is there any evidence there are abnormalities in the expression of genes that correlate with the neuro-anatomic or cellular findings that have been reported?'" Ring said.