• Comment (1)

Analysts Debate Importance of the 'Individual Mandate' to Health-Reform Law

Without directive to purchase insurance, costs to consumers, government would rise, all agree

March 22, 2012 RSS Feed Print

However, because fewer people would buy insurance if the mandate were eliminated, costs borne by the federal government would rise, the researchers said.

Eliminating the individual mandate would cut the predicted number of Americans buying new health coverage in 2016 from 27 million to 15 million and increase an individual's cost of buying insurance by 2.4 percent, according to the RAND analysis.

But Christine Eibner, an economist at RAND, said government spending for each person newly enrolled in a health insurance plan would more than double, reaching nearly $7,500 a person.

"Without the individual mandate, the government would have to spend more overall to insure a lot fewer people," Eibner said in a RAND news release.

More information

The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services outlines how women will fare under the Affordable Care Act.

To read an overview story on the Affordable Care Act, click here.

For legal experts' best guess on how the Supreme Court will rule on the Affordable Care Act, click here.

To learn more about the expansion of Medicaid under the Affordable Care Act, click here.

Copyright © 2012 HealthDay. All rights reserved.

Tags:
insurance,
Medicaid,
Medicare

Reader Comments Read all comments (1)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Eat + Run

advertisement

advertisement