New Prostate Cancer Screening Guidelines Boost 'Shared Decision Making'

Reader Comments

Back to article

Had my psa check annually since 50. When it went from 2.3 to 4.3 in one year, my family doctor sent me to a urologist. Biopsy showed a tumor on the edge of my prostate and surgery was conducted within 2 months.Gleason Score of 3+3. I was 55 when I had surgery.Robotic radical prostotechtomy. Walked out of the hospital (Jefferson in Philadelphia) less than 24 hours later.

This article sounds like the soft sell for saving insurance company's and the government health plan money. Waiting is a fools game in my opinion.

Europe just watches until the PSA is around 8.0....then with socialized medicine you wait for surgery while the cancer spreads. Why not, it save them money.

People die of this disease. A friend waited and did nothing out of fear and died 6 years later which was not necessary. It may take time but a moderate aggressive cancer ultimately spreads. I don't say this to scare you but to encourage you to get 2nd / 3rd opinions ASAP. Surgery. Radiation. Google prostate cancer and do you're homework. They are doing amazing things in this area now so stay positive.

Get at least 2 opinions from urologists and DON'T wait around. Deal with it sooner rather than later. Good luck. I'm praying for your husband.

R.P.R. of PA 1:02AM September 16, 2010

My husband is 55. His PSA is 9. He had a biopsy and just

found out that he has moderately aggressive cancer. We don't know what direction he should take?

Cindy of NY 9:18PM June 07, 2010

eat right

The hamberger generation is very lucky we have these discoveries now in time to spurn new discoveries before it's too late.

tom of FL 11:37AM May 02, 2010

eat right

The hamberger generation is very lucky we have these discoveries now in time to spurn new discoveries before it's too late.

tom of FL 11:37AM May 02, 2010

I don't understand where there should be any debate with respect to PSA screening. At age 54 my PSA was at 2. Two years later, it was over 5. My urologist recommended a biopsy. This is a walk-in walk-out procedure. They took 12 "core" samples, 6 on each side of the prostate. The results came back positive. One side showed cancer closer to the "margins" of the prostate. I opted for robotic surgery, prostatectomy. My surgeon also removed some lymph nodes on the side where the cancer had spread closer to the margins of the prostate. Fortunately, the cancer had not migrated beyond the prostate.

A digital rectal exam (DRE) would never have detected any problem as my prostate seemed perfectly normal.

PSA screening is essential and if your urologist suspects the possibility of cancer, the biopsy is a VERY effective way to evaluate your condition.

John of CA 9:21AM May 02, 2010

My father had never been given a PSA as part of his regular yearly physical. My father was a veteran and he learned that he could get assistance with his medicine if he began going to a clinic for veterans. As standard protocol for the physical at this clinic a PSA test was administered. My father's PSA came back elevated. After further testing, including a biopsy, it was determined that the cancer had not spread and that his gleason score showed that the cancer was not aggressive. My father, who was in his mid 70's and in very good health, was told he would die with the cancer, not from the cancer. The treatment my father chose was to do hormones treatments to keep his cancer at bay. This treatment worked very well for about a year and then something changed. Unfortunately, the urologist that was taking care of my father decided to ignore one of his PSA readings from one of his every four monthly visits. He said because the PSA jumped so much he just assumed it was a bad reading, but he never bothered to call my father in to have another test taken. So another four months went by before he was testing again, allowing the cancer to spread to his bones. My father died three years ago after a very brave fight against this terrible cancer. If I were a man and was told I had prostate cancer I would have it removed immediately -- why take the chance that either the cancer could change or you could end up with a doctor that was careless and should have never been practicing medicine. There are not too many types of cancer that can be completely removed from your body once you are diagnosed. I realize all the side effects that can potentially happen. But what is worse, living with the side effects or dying from the cancer. Seems like a no brainer to me.

tmp of GA 9:24AM March 08, 2010

Twelve years ago, I participated in one of those "health fair" screenings. The results showed a slightly elevated PSA, and I contacted a urologist for follow on. He conducted a biopsy which disclosed the early presence of cancer. After a rational discussion, I opted for a seed implant which solved the problem with no side effects. I can't imagine not taking a screening test and then arriving at a well thought out decision if the results show a presence of cancer.

Bob of TX 1:38PM March 05, 2010

I was diagnosed with cancer in 2005. At that time my PSA was under 3.0. My urologist recommended biopsy it came back positive, but low grade (for lack of a better definition). I was 44. The urologist advised that I needed immediate surgery. I visited with the surgeon he recommended, within days. The surgeon reviewed the PSA, biopsy, and my general health. He asked if I had any children and I shared that I did not. He said do you want any, I said maybe (laughing). Ultimately he explained to me the risks of surgery regarding my chances of producing children naturally. He then went on to say monitor things closely and take a year and see what happens in terms of children. With two conflicting recommendations I immersed myself in research. Based on my review of the evidence, including a then study by the VA to ascertain the risks of careful monitoring, I elected to adopt careful monitoring as my preferred method of treatment. Since that time the PSA has bounced up and down and has remained in the 5s or lower. I have enjoyed five years without the negatives, and they are negative, associated with surgery, and without any measurable symptoms (I had a lousy bladder before and still do, laughing). I have been called foolish and crazy. The research suggests otherwise. What I did is not for everyone. But, everyone should treat their physicians as advisors. Get at least one second opinion. As David shared the risks of surgery are great! The risks of doing nothing may be greater. But, do your own research, in consultation (not at the direction) of your physician. I would add only that if you elect either to not test or not treat that you work closely with your physician monitoring your health in general and that you attempt to adopt the healthiest lifestyle you can. I firmly believe that exercise, particularly cardio, and monitoring your health along with my physician is crucial!

of 2:01PM March 04, 2010

Where's my refund for all those worthless PSA tests?

In the end prostate cancer is a function of vitmain D levels. Why do ypou think blacks get it at such high rates- so young.

Suppliment to at least 50 ng/ml and take the redt of your life off. In the end, when it comes to fighting cancer, heart disease, diabetes, flu, bacterial infection, chronic pain, and just about everything else you can name it all comes down to your vitamin D serum level.

Nothing else matters but the D....

D3 of MD 8:14PM March 03, 2010

Any discussion of prostate cancer is incomplete without mentioning a common side effect of surgical removal of the prostate; Peyronies Disease. This disease, for which there is no satisfactory treatment, results from formation of penile scar tissue, makes intercourse difficult or impossible and is often accompanied by excruciating pain. It was reported in the July 2008, edition of Medical News Today that almost 20% of men developed this condition after removal of the prostate.

When I developed this condition, I was unaware that a disease like this even existed. In frustration, I started an informational website, www.curepeyronies.net Every email I get describes a man in a desperate situation with nowhere to turn. Urologists must do a better job of informing patients of this rather common side effect, so they will be able to give informed consent before undergoing treatment.

David of NY 5:51PM March 03, 2010

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Back to article

Eat + Run

advertisement

advertisement