Flu Shot in Pregnancy Protects Baby

Reader Comments

Back to article

mom's who got flu vaccine have 'bigger' babies? OMG - can't wait to read the fine print on this 'study'. can't wait to see who really funded this 'information'. what a load of cr@p.

Sarah of NY 8:58AM November 01, 2009

There must be a parallel universe in the world where these articles come from. The pregnancy study I saw was conducted without a placebo group, only an active control group. They did not compare the rates of influenza and hospitalizations against completely unvaccinated mothers, who may have have even lower rates of influenza or hospitalizations (but we will never know)the researchers compared the results to those who received a completely different vaccine, with it's own risks of adverse effects and toxic chemicals. This is a parallel universe that requires life saving cancer treatments go through a trial process requiring a placebo control group, but does not require one for vaccines which are injected into the bodies of our babies with undeveloped brains and immune systems. This is a parallel universe that does not publish studies showing damage done to the brains and neurological systems of newborn primates (www.thoughtfulhouse.org) by just one thimerosal containing vaccine (Hepatitis B) much less two thimerosal containing vaccines in utero ( seasonal and H!N! vaccines). A parallel universe that does not publish the study done at the mayo Clinic showing that vaccinated kids with asthma were three times more likely to be hospitalized than kids with asthma who did not get the vaccine. Or the one showing that the asthma rate is cut by 50% when the first dose of DPT vaccine is delayed from 2 months to 4 months. And then there is the universe where the CBS investigation into the CDC overstatement of confirmed cases of influenza (the number of cases confirmed were only 1 -2% of what the CDC was claiming to be H1N1)from May to July. The media participation in this hoax and propaganda camaign is very disturbing and the public really needs to do their own research before they accept these stories. for example, today the WHO determines that kids only need one shot not two as previously thought to have adequate immunity - is this just a convenient pronouncement in light of the scarcity of the vaccine, or is there any real science to back it up? and if there is science, why was it not done during the study phase rather than during the implementation phase? Thereason the shots ares scarce and delayed is that the .new culture meium that was supposedly developed by Medimmune, Novartis, Baxter, et al. did not grow the virus as well as they had predicted it would, and manufacturers had to change course mid stream and go back to the chicken egg method of production which they were caught unprepared for. Sounds like everyone has egg all over their faces and I pray the public figures it out before it is too late. The universe I live in is unfortunately filled with kids who's mothers got flu shots in prior years during pregnancy, and those children all have multiple learning disorders, speech and language delays, auto immune diseases, asthma, life threatening food allergies and other devastating impairments. Media - do not fail in your obligation.

novaccine4me of DC 3:03PM October 30, 2009

http://vactruth.com/2009/10/02/fda-approved-h1n1-vaccines-contain-ingredients-known-to-cause-cancer-and-death/

Dawn of NH 2:49PM October 30, 2009

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Back to article

Eat + Run

advertisement

advertisement