Diagnosed With Diabetes? 4 Tips for a Low-Carb Diabetes Diet

Reader Comments

Back to article

LOL, I *thought* maybe the ADA was starting to actually get it, until I read: "A good goal for diabetics is to have 45 to 60 grams of carbohydrate at each meal" Are they *kidding*? Those kind of carbs would shoot my post-prandial blood sugar through the stratosphere, well over 200 in no time flat! 45-60 in on the top border for a single day for most conscientious and savvy diabetics.

Here's a novel idea, instead of worrying about how much insulin to take to "cover" the carbs, how about not eating any carbs in the first place? After all, the body does have "essential protein" it requires to function, as well as "essential fatty acids" but there is NO SUCH THING as an "essential carb".

Deb of NJ 2:54PM April 15, 2009

Here's all you need to know to start livin' la vida low-carb ASAP:

CARBOHYDRATES raise BLOOD SUGAR

BLOOD SUGAR raises INSULIN

INSULIN leads to WEIGHT GAIN (fat storage) and METABOLIC SYNDROME

WEIGHT GAIN and METABOLIC SYNDROME lead to DIABETES and even DEATH

Any questions? Why do we make this debate more difficult than it needs to be?

Jimmy Moore, author of "Livin' La Vida Low-Carb"

http://www.livinlavidalowcarb.com/blog

Jimmy Moore of SC 3:04PM March 22, 2009

We teach biochemistry and nutrition to medical students at SUNY Downstate Medical Center. Among the things we teach is the point made in the article that (regardless of what somebody at the Mayo Clinic may say): “low-carb diets...have been touted for weight loss. Promoters of these diets contend that if carbs increase blood sugar and insulin levels and lead to weight gain, then limiting carbs should lower blood sugar and insulin levels, in turn leading to weight loss.”

More important for people with diabetes, we show medical students the data that carbohydrate restriction lowers blood glucose and stabilizes insulin fluctuations, dramatically lowers triglycerides and raises HDL(good cholesterol). Most significantly, low-carb diets reduce the need for medication. Consider the first tip in the article:

“1. Talk with your doctor or dietitian about how much insulin "covers" a particular amount of carbs.... For each meal, add all carbs in the food you plan to eat. Then take enough insulin to process that amount of carbohydrate.”

This is perhaps the strangest recommendation of any in medicine: encouraging something that will make a disease worse so that you can “cover” it with drugs.

During the course, a student asked: “why is the American Diabetes Association (ADA) opposed to low carbohydrate diets?” I quoted the 2008 guidelines which say something analogous to the article: “limit consumption of carb-heavy foods like bread, rice, starchy vegetables, grains, and fruit—but not avoid them altogether because some of these foods contain vitamins.” Why not avoid them altogether? The non-starchy vegetables recommended by low-carb diets provide more vitamins than rice and starchy vegetables. In any case, does Ann Albright think that taking a vitamin pill is in the same ballpark as injecting insulin?

Information on why carbohydrate restriction is beneficial is available without subscription at http://www.nutritionandmetabolism.com/content/pdf/1743-7075-5-9.pdf The paper is written by 24 clinicians and scientists, including directors of endocrine centers. It was rejected out of hand by Diabetes Care, one of the ADA publications. Also worth reading is Eric Westman’s commentary that deaths in the large diabetes ACCORD trial might have been avoided if carbohydrate restriction rather than intensive drug therapy were used. He concludes “At the end of our clinic day, we go home thinking, ‘The clinical improvements are so large and obvious, why don't other doctors understand?’ Carbohydrate-restriction is easily grasped by patients: because carbohydrates in the diet raise the blood glucose, and as diabetes is defined by high blood glucose, it makes sense to lower the carbohydrate in the diet….we have been able to taper patients off as much as 150 units of insulin per day in 8 days, with marked improvement in glycemic control-even normalization of glycemic parameters.”

Richard Feinman, Professor of Biochemistry.

Richard Feinman of NY 1:54PM March 22, 2009

What is amazing is that the recommendations of the ADA keep people diabetic. They seem to be incapable of reading research or understanding what they read.

Let's see - eating carbs raises blood sugar. Raising blood sugar is really bad for diabetics. Eureka! Advise diabetics to eat 50-60% of their calories from sugar!!

If you are a type II diabetic, go Eskimo. All of the vitamins and minerals you need can be found in meat, fish and eggs. Add a small green salad if you wish and you're cured.

But if you were cured, what would the ADA do? Fold I suppose. Can't have that!!

Fredrick Hahn of NY 9:28AM March 22, 2009

"Indeed, some people do shed pounds while on low-carb diets, but it probably isn't related to insulin or blood sugar levels, according to experts at the Mayo Clinic."

And I live in a world where the sky is pink with purple polka dots.

The Mayo Clinic folks ought to know that insulin is the fat storage hormone. They also ought to know that if you intake excess sugar, you don't use sugar to build anything, unlike fat and protein--you only use it for energy. Also, glucose is extremely dangerous if not taken into cells in some form or another. So what's a body to do? Store it up or pee it out. If you're not a diabetic who no longer produces insulin, you store it up. Ergo: body fat.

This is elementary stuff. The Mayo Clinic should know it. What's the Mayo Clinic got to hide that they will turn their backs on established science?

Then again, I could ask that of most doctors and medical organizations in America today.

(Right after writing the above, I hit the mayoclinic.com website to see what they think about healthy eating. I plugged in my numbers to their little dietary advice tool. Interesting. They want me to exist on 1200 calories a day, and they think I should eat more fruits and veggies than grains, and more grains than animal protein. No, I don't think so. I think I'll stick with my way of at least 500 to 1000 calories a day more than they're asking, animal protein at the base of my "dietary pyramid," as much fat as I want, and losing weight without starving. I notice they sell a diet book. I also notice they do bariatric surgery. Conflict of interest, much?)

Dana of OH 10:54PM March 20, 2009

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Back to article

Exclusive Diet Rankings

Find the best diet for your needs.

advertisement

Eat + Run

advertisement