Continuity of Information: Will EMRs Remedy Discontinuity of Care?

Reader Comments

Back to blog

I recently treated a patient new to our system. Other than the information that I could gather from her and her spouse, six pages of data were necessary for her optimal evaluation. This information was cleverly obfuscated in the 650 pages of EMR data that accompanied her. Most of this information was of no practical use. Things such as CBC ordered with date time to the 1/10 of second(clearly a high priority). If we are not careful we will soon drown in a sea of meaningless drival, brought on by system design by people who do not need to use these things in a daily fashion.

J Stokes of IL 4:03PM May 05, 2012

EHRs can be great, but improving continuity of care is certainly not something they help with. EHRs are by their very design incapable of sharing information from one clinic to another. While they may be capable of sharing information via the "HL-7" protocol, this is a barebones protocol with multiple different versions which has a hard time simply sharing laboratory data. The hundreds of different EHRs which the government has approved all use different databases, and even slight upgrades involve a new database structure. Because of this, the basic, raw data is incompatible between different EHRs and often even within the same EHR at different clinics. The only case where an EHR can improve continuity of care is when the care all occurs within a single, vertically integrated system, like a university system. Of course, in this case, the entire organization is simply using the same server farm.

Bryan in Illinois of IL 9:30AM May 05, 2012

My mom would always said, "Sweetheart, it's just growing pains."

I have a phone in my pocket the size of a small wallet --a mini-computer that takes pictures, video, talks to me, has GPS and on and on....

Are we really talking about electronic health records not happening? Let's just do it. And stop all the silliness.

Or will it be 2050 and we'll be pulling out paper files. The young people get this. Time to jump on board.

Art As Social Inquiry of PA 7:02PM May 04, 2012

EMR's have proven their worth when used inside a healthsystem. The ability to share information (test results, allergies, medications, vitals) has improved the patient expereince and care within the facilities. What we are faced with now is the ability to share outside. We live in an inter-connected world, and having information flow from the patient to the provider, from provider to provider, and then back to the patient is what will tip the scales to reduce cost (eliminate redunancy), and improve care. The question is incentive. Alturism and the goal of better care apparently does not cut it. Hosptials installed systems to save time and money -- they got it. Physicians are faster on paper; sharing that information does not work, and there needs to be an incentive to do that. HiTECH is the start. I would suggest the largest incentive to get the process right lies with you and I... the patient. My own experience has proven that by demanding that entities share information improves the outcomes and reduces overall costs; and improves the experience. I think the greatest challenge is to get the patients involved in their care -- when we can incent that correctly; we'll see change for the better.

Mark of CO 6:58PM May 04, 2012

Overall emr's are a good thing. However doctors MUST learn to take their eyes off the computer and look at the patient and talk to the patient not while typing.

marion of CA 12:23AM May 04, 2012

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Back to blog

Second Opinion

Second Opinion is the public square where U.S. News editors and researchers air their views and invite comments about evaluating the quality of hospitals, physicians, health insurance plans, nursing homes, and other healthcare institutions.

Health rankings editor Avery Comarow and deputy Steve Sternberg curate the column. They have more than six decades of medical reporting experience between them. Comarow has overseen Best Hospitals and other U.S. News health rankings since 1990.

advertisement

advertisement