TV Watching Is Bad for Babies' Brains

Reader Comments

Back to blog

I know a site talking about watching TV online, and I have personally tried that.

Good quality for the price. http://www.onlinetvwatching.net

Kevin of WY 10:01AM February 16, 2011

Ifeel that it is important what our kids begin watching on tv because it has a real effect on the kids and their choices today, I know because I am a mother of three and I see what it would and can do to my kids if I wasnt home with them to teach them better. It cause them to rush with their homework (JUST PUT ANYTHING ON THE PAPER),to get to the television. I feel that no television should be allowed during the week only on weekends and should only be educational channels,such as Dora, Diego and Spongebob is ok..Their should always be a limit. Children that look as gang, drug and adult movies are more likely to become successful in school which cause their grades to drop ,less focus and not completing school, thayts why when you start them at a young age,it will stick with them as they grow up to what not to do and what is approopiate for them.

Mary wallace of GA 12:34PM January 18, 2011

I'm sorry but most "primarily spanish speaking families" that live in my neighborhood feed their children tons of candy even as babies that are made of tamarind and are on the list of recalled candy this year as containing waaaay over the authorized amounts of LEAD that is allowed in a consumable product. So it could be tv but I'm hedging my bets that its the lead causing problems.

norcalnightmare of CA 5:45PM December 18, 2010

I'm the mom of an 18-month old daughter. She watches NickJr (no commercials, lots of music) almost every day in the morning while we're getting ready and eating breakfast and in the evening while I'm preparing dinner. In all honesty, it probably totals 2 hours a day, maybe more. Her vocabulary is off the charts and she has been early for nearly every milestone. Her memory is amazing. I don't substitute TV for other activities such as reading, coloring, building or playing outside, but it has a rightful place in our daily life. As is the case with so many things with children, I think teaching responsible TV habits will serve everyone well in the future. And heck yeah, when you're home alone with a rambunctious toddler, sometimes 30 minutes of TV time can be a huge sanity saver for mom or dad.

Also, this study seems limited in so many ways. I'm not sure it's reasonable to connect TV viewing to negative developmental outcomes in a population that faces a number of other challenges that can also affect development.

Rebecca of CT 2:34PM December 18, 2010

My baby girl just turned 15 months and she absolutely LOVES NickJr. I let her watch it in the morning when I'm making breakfast, at night while I'm getting ready for work (I work nights), and whenever I need to get things done around the house. She is an extremely intelligent little girl and her vocabulary is over 50 words already (at her 15 month check-up, the doctor said the average vocabulary at 15 months was 4-5 words.) She can also point out all her basic body parts from head to toe, she knows most animals sounds, and she understands different commands. She is an avid reader as well. She loves to "read" everything that has words, to include signs on store walls! She will point to and follow along with the words while speaking in her baby gibberish. I don't think there is anything wrong with TV as long as the child is watching the right type of program and as long as parents are also including other activities throughout the day to educate their children. In fact, I believe that children can learn a great deal from the programs that they watch.

Kristen of GA 1:44PM December 18, 2010

I have 3 children, ages 13, 11, and 15 months. When my daughters were babies, I limited their TV watching to PBS. It is saturated with language development programming and math and science.

My girls have always had a very well developed vocabulary and started reading as soon as they were old enough to hold a book. My oldest daughter was reading 3 syllable words at age 4 and knew some words that some adults can't even pronounce much less know the meaning of. They are both, now, honor roll students with an avid love for reading and writing stories, not to mention drawing. They both tutor other classmates and friends and my second daughter is in Beta club and the Accelerated Art program in her elementary school. She already is making plans on what she wants to do when she grows up and is starting the steps to qualify for a scholorship when she graduates because we can't afford to pay for her college.

My 15 month old is also watching PBS everyday. That's basically the only programming on tv during the day. He already has an advanced vocabulary and can speak more words than babies his age and is starting to speak in two word phrases. He can also sign the word "more" and "all gone". He understands most of what I say and reacts accordingly to everything I say to him.

I think TV in general isn't the problem, so much as what the child is exposed to and how much time the parents spend teaching their children. A baby who doesn't have verbal stimulation and is only baby talked to will obviously have trouble developing a decent ability to pronounce and understand words. A baby who has hands on learning time with their parents, recieves a lot of vocabulary input and who's parents use words that are more advanced than the average person will most definately pick up on that knowledge and learn more. It's common sense.

There are a lot of factors that go into how a child learns and develops. If a study is to be done, there needs to be a control group. Working parents vs. an at home parent, poverty, the intelligence level of the parents, needs to be considered in a study like this. It needs to be more scientific to be accurate.

Angela of LA 3:56PM December 17, 2010

I definitly agree with the findings. My daughter is 2 1/2. She doesn't watch any TV. She is an avid reader and has a wonderful imagination. My daughter has the rest of her life to sit in front of the TV. It is difficult sometimes because I have a 6 month old and it would be easy to just stick her in front of the TV. I think it is more important for her to interact with me. The 6month old learns a lot from just watching her. We all play together.

Nicole of RI 8:04AM December 17, 2010

Yeah, I've always believed that tlevision is pure poison.

I think infants are attracted to the color and movement of images. It is what they are seeing that atracts them at such a young age. They are not yet able to understand what they are seeing, but they no less become addicted to watching.

Later, they learn to wrong things as they hear and start understanding. I think violence in movies and cartoons acts to desensitize them as it does to everyone.

Television is okay, for the most part. But for children I think we all have to make serious decisions about what they watch and how often they are before the television screen.

This is one reason why I promote family hobby concepts. Inteeracting and learning are keys to early developement of children. Strong bonding comes from such quality time spent together.

Just my brief thoughts.

Merry Christmas to all of you. Have a great New Year too!

Larry

Larry Price of CA 1:54PM December 15, 2010

my baby is 9 wks today, i keep the tv on the baby first channel. she doesn't really pay attention to it at this age but its constantly playing music and she loves music. but this channel was intended for babies. is it still bad to keep it on?

Krystal of AL 1:26PM December 15, 2010

Having seen the whole study, it seems incredibly weak.

It's a one-day sample, as recalled by the parent. The subjects were initially six month olds; I don't imagine anyone posits a lot of cognitive learning from TV at that age. The follow-up assessment at 14 months doesn't really qualify it as a "longitudinal" study, but more as a post-exposure snapshot. I hope they'll test again every six months or so. AS an example why, note that the study quoted most often as showing that TV time leads to language deficits in toddlers actually found that any gap disappeared within months.

Biggest of all, while they say they looked for children for whom the mother was the primary caregiver, there is no mention of assessing home conditions, competence or confidence of the mother, child care arrangements, and so on. I should think all those things would have a huge effect on how much time the child is left to watch TV, and an even larger effect on intellectual, social and emotional development.

Here's a useful guide for looking at research on children and media: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/david-kleeman/screen-time-screeds----wh_b_658738.html

Barack Like Me of IL 3:04PM December 13, 2010

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Back to blog

On Parenting

On Parenting

Parenting may be an art, but there's a lot of science behind raising healthy, thriving children. Contributing Editor Nancy Shute explores the latest discoveries and developments affecting children's health and parenting. Send her your comments and questions at onparenting@usnews.com.

Health Check

advertisement

advertisement