Get Botox, Land That Job!
Every so often, I open an E-mail that makes me cringe. This week a press release titled "How Botox can help you get a new job" brought out those frown lines. It detailed a study published in the June issue of the journal Dermatologic Surgery in which 300 volunteers rated "before" or "after" photos of 17 women who had had Botox injections in their brow, forehead, and eye wrinkles. The volunteers gave higher scores to the "after" photos for attractiveness, dating appeal, and athletic ability—all qualities that improve the first impressions people make when meeting a potential boss, argues the study's author.
But when I looked at a couple of the photos—which you can do below—I couldn't see much difference between the two images.

True, her forehead wrinkles are smoothed out. But is that really enough to make a difference to a boss? Study leader Steven Dayan, a clinical assistant professor of surgery at the University of Illinois in Chicago, thinks that the subtler changes make her more appealing, which could well influence someone who's hiring. "Botox raises the eyebrows a bit, opens the eyes, and spreads the width between them to make a person look friendlier," he says. "Those first impressions that tell us whom we like better may be determined subconsciously in a primitive part of the brain called the amygdala." Also, he theorizes, people may exude a look of confidence—a selling point in a job interview—when they feel better about the way they look. (Dayan has taken speaking fees from Botox maker Allergan and used an educational grant from the company to finance his study.)
Still, the study didn't ask the participants to specifically rate a person's potential to land a job. And it didn't find a statistical difference in ratings of before and after shots on the ability to succeed financially or in the workplace. However, the smiling faces—before and after—got better ratings in these two areas. So maybe a smile could work better than Botox in a job interview.
I'm certainly not against Botox to diminish signs of aging if that's what a woman wants. Heck, I use a retinol eye cream every night for my own fine lines. And a growing number of women as well as men—as my colleague Adam Voiland previously blogged—are turning to cosmetic procedures to remain competitive in the workplace. What I am against are the scare tactics that bully women into thinking that they've got to cosmetically alter their appearance if they want to succeed professionally. Yes, research has shown that thin, attractive, tall folks make more money than their fatter, plainer, shorter counterparts. But do we really need to buy into the must-not-age-at-any-cost mentality?
"If you're really good at what you do, you'll be competitive in the work force whether you have wrinkles or not," says Ann Kearney-Cooke, director of the Cincinnati Psychotherapy Institute and author of Change Your Mind, Change Your Body: Feeling Good Again About Your Body and Self After 40. She says she worries about her female patients in their 30s who have already made Botox part of their beauty regimen, taking their fear of growing older to an extreme. What's more, she objects to them putting their beauty in someone else's needle-wielding hands instead of taking charge of it themselves by eating nutritious foods, exercising, and developing their passions. "I have to be honest—I can't say I'll never get Botox," the 52-year-old psychologist confides to me. "But I also know my signature strengths, both mentally and physically, and know that I can be attractive at any age." Plus, her patients don't care if she has wrinkles—in fact, many may view them as a sign of experience.
On that note, I think I'll take my inspiration from the actress Cate Blanchett, the 39-year-old mother of three who said last month that she's proud of her imperfections and would never consider having plastic surgery to fix them. She tells Britain's Glamour magazine, "I see someone's face, someone's body who has had children, and I think they're the song lines of your experience, and why would you want to eradicate that?" See her gorgeous song lines here.
Tags: cosmetic procedures
Tools:
Share
|
| Comments (3) | Print
Reader Comments
Wondering...
In the example picture shown above, the 'Before' picture shows the collar of her shirt, while the 'After' picture shows bare neck and shoulders. That almost subliminal display of more skin would in itself, if it is representative of their testing methodology, introduce so much error into the tests that the results would be useless.
The subtle psychological cues from that wouldn't just affect male observers. She is shown with less 'armor', but still looks confident - in fact, she seems to be *more* confident. I'd imagine that would affect first impressions more than a millimeter change in the curve of her brow.
In the last century in the US a women could project first-impressions varying from 'homemaker' to 'harlot' simply by varying the amount of *ankle* exposed by the hem of her skirt. Attraction is very complex; I'm not sure it can be usefully described using checkboxes on a clipboard. And I don't think coming up with new ways to make women feel bad about how they look is particularly useful, other than as a marketing tool for companies that want to fix the 'problems' that they have basically invented to control women.
Bottom line: a happy woman is beautiful. A woman who is worried about how she looks is usually not happy, and no amount of makeup or botox is going to fix that.
Hooray!
Thanks for you your article, its time that people embrace their own ideal instead of someone elses.
I can't see a difference
I think that it's incredibly sad that volunteers choose the younger looking of the two. I am aging and trying to do it gracefully and at 30 I do see the way I am treated compared to my younger counterparts. And the sad truth is that often it is with age that one actually becomes great at her job. I've met few 23 year olds that are as sharp as the 30+ group yet because of their youth, they are given advantages.
advertisement







