So Long, 2008—and Farewell, Cheap Asthma Inhalers
The last day of 2008 means more than the dawn of a new year for asthmatics. For those told to carry albuterol inhalers with them to use in the event of an asthma attack, it's also the last day that the chlorofluorocarbon, or CFC, inhalers that they'd long been accustomed to can legally be sold in the United States. CFCs are harmful to the environment, so they are being replaced in inhalers with environmentally friendlier hydrofluoroalkane, or HFA. Unfortunately, the new, eco-sensitive inhalers are not yet available in generic form.
I made the trip to my pharmacy about two weeks ago to pick up my prescription for HFA albuterol inhalers. Like other asthmatics, I was dismayed by the cost: a $30 copay for two inhalers under my insurance (which paid $43.72 toward the cost). In the past, my copay had been just $10 for each pair of generic albuterol inhalers containing CFCs. The Food and Drug Administration has approved the following HFA inhalers: ProAir HFA Inhalation Aerosol, Proventil HFA Inhalation Aerosol, and Ventolin HFA Inhalation Aerosol; also, another HFA inhaler that contains levalbuterol, a medication similar to albuterol, is sold as Xopenex HFA Inhalation Aerosol.
But I'll have a cheaper alternative the next time I need a refill. Wal-Mart announced yesterday that it will sell an approved HFA inhaler, made exclusively for Wal-Mart by ReliOn, starting at $9 apiece. That's good news for asthmatics for whom cost is a barrier to picking up the new inhalers.
Robert Fisher, a Wisconsin allergist and a fellow of the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology, says that his patients have expressed concerns about paying for the more expensive HFA inhalers out of pocket. And even patients like me who have insurance coverage are liable to pay more, because the copays for brand-name medications tend to be higher than generic copays.
The new HFA inhalers also deliver a softer spray, which has some patients complaining to their doctors that they don't feel that the meds work as well as CFC inhalers. The spray from HFA inhalers "doesn't come out as cold or as forcefully," Fisher says. Still, he says, "the active ingredient is the same."
In fact, studies show that the newer inhalers are just as effective as the old ones, says my allergist, Bruce Bochner, director of the division of allergy and clinical immunology at the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine and an AAAAI fellow. "These new products are delivering as much albuterol as the old ones," he says. "They may taste or feel different, but it should work as well."
If you still have older CFC albuterol inhalers in your purse, pocket, or medicine cabinet, feel free to use them up. Just check the expiration date, experts advise; many people carry inhalers around for months or years. If they've expired, it's time to call your doctor for a prescription for an HFA inhaler, says David Shulan, a New York allergist and an AAAAI fellow. Whatever you do, don't stop using your inhaler (I regret making that mistake) without talking to your doctor first.
So far, asthmatics seem to be adjusting well to the change. "We started switching people over a year ago," Shulan says. "In the past year, I've had maybe one complaint. The vast majority of people really have not complained about problems with the switchover."
Read more
- Asthma's New Expense: Phaseout of inhaler leaves patients gasping with sticker shock.
Tags: asthma | respiratory problems
Tools:
Share
|
| Comments (36) | Print
Reader Comments
HFA inhalers
HFA INHALERS are less effective and I am left with a cough, I am wheezing when I least expect it, and am having no relief.
Proventil HFA
These inhalers do not work anywhere near as well as the old CFC inhalers. Prior to starting on the HFA inhalers I only used oxygen at night now I am on oxygen constantly and still remain short of breath. I have made my doctors aware of this and the response iI get is 'A lot of my patients say that it doesn't work as well. Seems we"ve taken a giant step backward at a much greater expense both monetarily and physically to the patient.
I need my environmentally unfriendly inhaler!!!
For a non-smoker who only needs an inhaler occasionally, I haven't been able to breathe in 2 weeks since the last of my CFC inhaler was used up. Never before have I woken up in the middle of the night wheezing until I filled my pricey script for ProAir and I now have a daytime cough that won't go away since using it. I find it deplorable that with all of the meds out there they can't come up with something better than this. The Ozone law passed in 1987 has given the pharmaceutical companies ample time to research a better product. Instead of moving forward and providing asthmatics with a better product for the higher cost, we are paying outrageous amounts for an inferior product. I would be better off using an over the counter mist because they produce the same results: coughing, wheezing and the feeling that your lungs are not functioning at full capacity. And after enduring that long enough there is the inevitable trip to the emergency room for a stronger treatment. I wouldn't mind the cost of the new inhalers if they produced the same results as the inhalers I have used my entire life. Because breathing is not to be taken for granted, it is priceless. A rescue inhaler is called that for a reason and I have yet to be rescued by the new meds available.
-Disappointed and wheezing.
advertisement







