Andrew Cuomo Takes On Insurers
Healthcare bills have always been baffling. Indeed, it's hard to think of a less aptly named document than your insurer's "Explanation of Benefits." Now there's even more reason to worry you're being overcharged. According to an investigation by New York Attorney General Andrew Cuomo, insurers have been systematically low-balling their reimbursements to some physicians and hospitals—leaving consumers to pick up too much of the tab.
The investigation focuses on services by doctors, hospitals, and other providers who are outside the health plan's approved network. About three quarters of people are in health plans that allow them to use such out-of-network services, usually with the proviso that they're responsible for about 20 percent of the bill. But here's the catch: If the provider's bill exceeds what is "reasonable and customary" for similar services in that geographic area, the insurer won't pay the whole bill, leaving the consumer on the hook for not only his or her 20 percent share but also for any amount above that reasonable and customary level.
For example, Cuomo's investigation found that in New York City, where a physician might bill $200 for a typical office visit, the amount the insurer would reimburse based on reasonable and customary rates was just $77. So a consumer who expects to pay 20 percent, or $40, for this hypothetical visit would actually get stuck with a bill for $138, because the insurer would only pay 80 percent of the $77 reasonable and customary rate—or $62. "I don't think most people understand this," says Ron Pollack, executive director of Families USA, a healthcare consumer advocacy group.
The practice isn't new; insurers have been incorporating reasonable and customary rates into their payment formulas for decades. Before managed care created the distinction between "in network" and "out of network" providers, they relied on a database of provider charges compiled by an insurance industry trade group to help determine what to pay on every claim. These days, the database of 1.3 billion records of provider charges used to set those out-of-network reimbursements is maintained by a company called Ingenix, which is owned by UnitedHealth Group, one of the country's largest insurers.
Cuomo argues that the Ingenix database used by UnitedHealth and other insurers is "defective" and "manipulated," according to the press release announcing the investigation earlier this month. He says the company deletes a disproportionate number of high fees from the database, for example, so that customary rates appear lower than they really are. "By distorting the 'reasonable and customary' rate, the United insurers were able to keep their reimbursements artificially low and force patients to absorb a higher share of the costs." Cuomo announced that he intends to sue Ingenix, UnitedHealth Group, and three other subsidiaries and has issued subpoenas to other major health insurers that use the Ingenix data, including Aetna, Cigna, and Humana.
In a statement responding to the investigation, UnitedHealth says its data are "rigorously developed, geographically specific, comprehensive and organized using a transparent methodology that is very common in the healthcare industry." The company says it is cooperating with Cuomo.
Just how appropriate the "reasonable and customary" levels are will emerge as the investigation proceeds. What is apparent right now is that consumers need better price transparency. Anyone who's ever tried to figure out how much he or she can expect to pay out of pocket for surgery, lab work, or even a specialist consultation has discovered just how opaque and convoluted our current system is.
Experts agree: If you can stay in-network, do. Out-of-network care usually has a higher deductible in addition to those pesky reasonable and customary restrictions. If you can't avoid going out-of-network, do this: Find out from the doctor what the charge will be and ask your insurer ahead of time how much of that the company will pay, says Robert Laszewski, a health policy consultant and former insurance executive. Then ask your doctor if he or she will accept that amount as payment in full.
"Most of the time they'll accept the reasonable and customary amount if you ask them to because that's what they normally get," says Laszewski. It's a bit of a hassle, but what have you got to lose?
Tags: healthcare | health insurance | Andrew Cuomo
Tools: 
Share
|
| Comments (7) | Print
Reader Comments
Insurers
Your acticle was accurate except for the last paragraph.
Providers are out-of-network because they can't provide quality service, office environment, and staff to do all the required certifications, authorizations, refilings, and appealls trying to get paid per their contract on the fictional "reasonable and customary"allowed amount dreamed up by the managed cost faction that manages the patient's insurance. Providers will not accept this because "that is what they normally get". A wallpaper hanger makes more per hour than I would if I accepted "reasonable and customary" of many insurers. Question: why are all the reasonable and customary rates for the same geographical area different between companies? Your statement is also misleading because by contract, providers must collect the full deductible amount on the patient's policy.
As a private practitioner in practice before managed cost (masked as managed care) replaced good patient care and professional business ethics, I have observed many good providers close their office due to these tactics. If the public realized how their health care has been and is now being controlled and compromised by this squeeze there should be an uprising. I, too, am scheduled to close my practice.
Misleading "INSERT" in two ways
This insert has nothing to do with Mr Cuomo's fight with the insurance companies regarding his charges that the insurer's are "systematically underpaying some physicians" and therefore leaving the patients with a larger out of pocket bill.
Furthermore, the insert "Find out what your insurer will pay, and ask the doctor to accept that as payment in full." This is 'GROSSLY' taken out of context because Mr. Laszewski suggest this when the patient CANNOT avoid going out of the network. (That is how I read your article.)
Doctor visits are what they for many reasons including the practice salaries (the physicians, secretaries, nurses, lab technicians, office assistants, transcriptionists, custodians, and service/repairman ) and "usual and customary" office overhead expenses including but not limited to the utilities, the phone bill, yellow page advertising, computers and software support, mortgage, and office supplies both medical and non-medical and medical equipment, and the list goes on and on.
And let us not forget all the insurances including fire, water, theft, general liability, workman's compensation, health and dental for employees, and malpractice.
Also, the time consuming billing of each patients' insurance and re-filing and multiple re-filings FOR the patients. Noting the practice CANNOT charge the insurance company any administrative fees for ALL of this work.
The insurance companies for decades have stated percentages instead of amounts that they pay or reimburse
They pit the patients against the doctor stating the doctors fees are higher than the "usual and customary" charges for the area but cannot and do not provide documentation of these fee schedules.
Why not just provide a fee schedule for all procedures? The insurance would not be marketable without these deceptive percentages.
Why different percentages for in and out of network services? This is another way to further decrease the insurance companies' liability and decrease how much they pay.
We all let the insurance companies get away with not paying. What happens when the patient does NOT pay, of course the insurance is terminated.
We (the patients - the insured) buy the insurance to have if we need it and then we expect it to pay.
Take your own example of $200 for the office visit, while the insurance company pays $77 under the disguise that $77 is the usual and customary fee for that service. This represents 37.5% for that basic service not the advertised and presumed 80% when the policy coverage was presented and sold to the insured. The visit would have needed to cost less than $97 for the 80% to equal the insurers' 'usual and customary' fee of $77. It is highly unlikely that this physician is charging more than twice as much as the other physicians in his area. DO the MATH!
Another cost to the doctor is the high cost of billing and collections and the losses from the uncollected debt.
Simply, do you want the doctor to be there when you are sick and wish to be seen THAT day, not the first available appointment perhaps in a week or two or even wait until the following day? Make the insurances pay what they promise and make them pay the first time they are billed. AND, those office vist would be LESS.
In closing would you take a 63.5% pay cut tomorrow if U.S. NEWS and WORLD REPORT were cutting cost simply to make more money for the company. I doudt it!
GO! Cuomo!
out of network
Last fall my husband was referred to a Cancer Center for treatment. I asked prior to seeing the doctor whether the facility took our United Health Care insurance and was assured that they did. What I failed to ask was whether they were an in-network provider or out-of-network provider. It turned out they were an out -of-network provider with separate deductibles and copays. We ended up paying with a Home equity loan $24,000 in separate deductibles and copays last year. The kicker is the that the U of WI Paul Carbone Comprehensive Cancer Center is promoted by United Health Family as a NCCN Cancer center of Excellence so why they are not network alludes me. I have written a letter of inquiry(in January) but have yet to hear from them.
advertisement
