Friday, September 5, 2008

Diabetes

A New Approach to Managing Diabetes

For some people, it may be better to bring down blood pressure and cholesterol than blood glucose

Posted June 10, 2008

Some people with type 2 diabetes might want to rethink how they manage their disease, based on a trio of new studies showing that tightly controlling blood glucose levels doesn't reduce cardiovascular disease in people at high risk, perhaps because they have high blood pressure or are overweight. Reaching blood pressure and cholesterol goals rather than blood glucose targets may be more important in preventing heart attack and stroke in these people, say experts. In those who are newly diagnosed with diabetes and are not already in the high-risk category, intensively managing blood sugar may be effective at reducing heart risk.

Video: Health Epidemics
Video: Health Epidemics

Cardiovascular problems account for about two-thirds of deaths in people with type 2 diabetes, and it has long been thought that if patients' A1C levels—a measure of average blood sugar over the preceding two to three months—could be reduced to about 6 percent, the high end of normal for nondiabetics, many cardiovascular complications could be reduced or avoided. Current treatment guidelines call for people with type 2 diabetes to maintain A1C levels of 7 percent or lower, but in the United States the actual average is closer to 7.8 percent, according to Ann Albright, president of healthcare and education for the American Diabetes Association.

The latest studies—of more than 23,000 people with type 2 diabetes—all tried to determine whether using oral drugs and insulin to bring A1C levels down to the 6 percent range reduced cardiovascular events such as heart attack, stroke, and death. Subjects were generally in their 60s, had had diabetes for several years, and had A1C levels above 7 percent. About a third had already had a cardio event like a heart attack or stroke, and many were at high risk for cardiovascular problems because they had high blood pressure or cholesterol, smoked, or were obese.

Subjects were divided into two groups. One received intensive treatment aimed at reducing A1C to as low as 6 percent; a control group received standard treatment. The studies tracked participants for at least five years, although one study, sponsored by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, halted the intensive treatment portion of the study in February after just 3.5 years when it was found that this group had a 22 percent increased risk of death compared to the standard group. Researchers presented the findings of the three trials—the NHLBI's ACCORD study, the ADVANCE study conducted by researchers for the George Institute for International Health in Australia, and the VA Diabetes Trial—at the American Diabetes Association's 68th annual scientific sessions in San Francisco this week.

The studies' results should not be interpreted as a license to ignore blood glucose levels, researchers warn. Although tight glycemic control didn't reduce cardiovascular problems in high-risk individuals, maintaining healthy blood sugar levels remains important for preventing microvascular complications, including kidney, eye, and nerve damage. In fact, the ADVANCE trial found a 21 percent reduction in kidney disease risk among those whose blood sugar was managed intensively.

Moreover, many Americans with type 2 diabetes have a long way to go to reach the 7 percent target—never mind aiming lower. "My fear is that the typical diabetes person with type 2 and an A1C of 8.5 will say, 'I don't need to focus on my A1C,'" says Tom Boyer, executive director of the Diabetes Care Coalition, an educational organization sponsored by the ADA and other diabetes groups. "What these studies say is that A1C needs to be kept at near normal levels but not go too low."

It's unclear why participants in the NHLBI's intensive group with stricter A1C controls faced a higher risk of death. The two other studies did not report a similar increased mortality risk.

Rather than demonstrating that one type of treatment is more useful than another, these studies show that there's no one-size-fits-all solution, experts say. "You have to individualize your treatment goals," says Martin Abrahamson, medical director of the Joslin Diabetes Center in Boston. "You have to take into account who the patient is, and what other co-morbidities they have, and their projected life span, and so on."

Reader Comments

Reality Check for Type 2 Diabetes "Tight Control" Clinical Trials

In my opinion these "Tight Control" clinical trials were not very conclusive.

These studies were paid for by drug companies that are interested in selling there products. There "tight control" was eating very high amounts of carbs and trying to obtain "tight control" by using multiple drugs and insulin.

A very low carbohydrate diet (30 to 60 carbs a day) has been shown to give much lower glucose levels without increased risk of death.

This articles test methods basically promote eating all of the carbs that you want and balancing that with multiple drugs and insulin shots. These do not work because of the inevitable very high fluctuations in glucose levels that lead to hypoglycemia, hyperglycemia, and cardiovascular deteriation.

But do not ignore high blood pressure or cholesterol either. Control all three and a type 2 diabetic person can prevent all of the terrible potential consequences of diabetes. Just don't rely of on eating high levels of carbs and taking large doses of multiple medications and insulin as a treatment.

Exercise is also very important. Get at least 30 minutes of vigorous exercise at least five times a week.

Test your glucose levels two hours after meals and try to keep your levels in the 70 to 100 range at that time.

There are many excellent books and websites available on better treatment methods for diabetes that provide proof of there usefulness with published clinical trials. My favorite book is Dr. Richard Bernstein’s Diabetes Solution The Complete Guide to Achieving Normal Blood Sugars. A great website about diabetes control is http://bloodsugar101.com

Glucose levels.

I check my glucose level after waking and before eating, usually 8-10 hours. My glucose level at this time is mostly in the 130 -150 range. Random checks during the day show much lower levels: 100- 120. Is this unusual? I do not take medication for type 2 diabetes.

I have type 2

Low carb is the key and I find I eat more now than I ever did. I used to skip breakfast and sometimes lunch but if I want to do it right I should eat a good breakfast, snack before lunch, lunch, another snack before dinner, a snack before I go to bed. a numer of small nutrional helpings of food throughout the day is another route to take. I guess I've taken them all. I take oral pill and try to keep it in the right range on my monitor . Stress from working or from other things make my range go higher but I take that into consideration and work at bringing it back down. liz

Add your thoughts

Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

advertisement

Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our Terms and Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy.